Skip to content

Federal data × LLM scoring

AI Career Stats

Diagnostic hub · SOC 25-2031.00

Will AI replace Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education?

Teach one or more subjects to students at the secondary school level.

Partially. Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education scores 42/100 — some core duties are highly automatable, but enough durable human work remains that the occupation is transforming rather than disappearing overnight.

Highly automated tasks

1

Tasks scored ≥ 80% automatable

Safer human tasks

7

Physical or <30% automation probability

Digital weight

45%

Share of scored tasks labeled digital

Academic Research Validation · Multi-Model Analysis

Multi-Model Benchmark Consensus

Independent cross-validation comparing AI Career Stats against OpenAI, UPenn, and Human Expert research for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education.

Augmentation Bias Identified
Cross-framework review
Task-Weighted LLM Primary

AI Career Stats

Gemini 3.8 Flash

42 / 100
Moderate Exposure

O*NET task statements weighted by frequency and structural importance.

GPT-4 Direct Exposure

OpenAI / UPenn (α)

GPT-4 Zero-Shot

3 / 100
Lower Exposure

Proportion of tasks where an LLM alone halves human task completion time.

GPT-4 + Software Tools

OpenAI / UPenn (β)

GPT-4 + Software Tooling

33 / 100
Moderate Exposure

Exposure when language models are augmented with domain APIs & software.

Annotator Consensus

Human Expert Panel

Subject Matter Panel

34 / 100
Moderate Exposure

Independent consensus scored by human domain and labor annotators.

Methodological Synthesis & Cross-Model Insights

Software Tooling Expansion Effect (+30 pts)

OpenAI / UPenn research measures an increase from 3/100 (standalone model) to 33/100 when AI is paired with external software applications. For Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education, task displacement is significantly amplified once agents can directly read, write, and execute across professional software ecosystems.

Comparative Analysis: AI Career Stats evaluates O*NET task statements with fine-grained task importance weights using Gemini 3.8 Flash, yielding an overall vulnerability score of 42/100. By comparison, independent human expert annotators rated this occupation at 34/100.

Exposure accelerates drastically when language models are coupled with specialized software tooling. Academic researchers define exposure as whether access to a state-of-the-art model reduces task completion time by at least 50% without quality degradation.

Source: Eloundou et al., "GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models"

OpenAI, OpenResearch & University of Pennsylvania Research Benchmark.

What the 42 / 100 score means

The score is an importance-weighted average of automation probabilities across the top 15 O*NET tasks for SOC 25-2031.00. 1 task score at or above 80% automatable; 7 fall into the safer band (under 30% or labeled physical). Roughly 45% of scored tasks are primarily digital.

Official BLS data places median pay for this occupation family at $72,040. with projected employment change of -0.2% over the latest 10-year outlook window. Typical entry education: Bachelor's degree.

Wage and growth context ($72,040, -0.2%) should be read alongside the AI score — not as a substitute for it.

Why this score

  • Overall automation risk is moderate because, while instructional prep and grading are highly automated, in-person behavioral management and relationship-building remain resilient.
  • Curriculum drafting and assessment evaluation most strongly drive automation exposure, whereas direct classroom discipline and student counseling safeguard the role.
  • This quarter, educators should integrate GenAI tools into routine lesson planning and grading to reduce administrative overhead and reclaim instructional time for direct student interaction.

Most exposed duties

None of the top 15 tasks currently clear the ≥80% automation threshold — exposure is more diffuse across mid-range probabilities.

More durable work

Few tasks in this profile clear the “safe” threshold, which is why the aggregate score skews higher and why adjacent lower-risk careers deserve serious consideration.

Tooling Ecology · Software & AI Automation

Software & AI Copilot Matrix

Core technology stack, market demand, and generative AI copilot integrations for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education.

6 of 8 (75%) AI-Augmented
5 in-demand hot technologies

Ecosystem Automation Summary: 6 of 8 core software tools (75%) currently feature direct AI copilot integrations or native machine intelligence. As enterprise software suites embed LLM capabilities directly into primary interfaces, productivity gains compress task hours without requiring workers to adopt standalone AI platforms.

Native AI Integration 🔥 In-Demand

Microsoft Excel

Spreadsheet software

Equipped with native machine learning models, intelligent autofill, or algorithmic classification features.

Native AI Integration 🔥 In-Demand

Microsoft Office software

Office suite software

Equipped with native machine learning models, intelligent autofill, or algorithmic classification features.

Native AI Integration 🔥 In-Demand

Microsoft PowerPoint

Presentation software

Equipped with native machine learning models, intelligent autofill, or algorithmic classification features.

Native AI Integration 🔥 In-Demand

Microsoft SharePoint

Document management software

Equipped with native machine learning models, intelligent autofill, or algorithmic classification features.

Native AI Integration 🔥 In-Demand

Microsoft Word

Word processing software

Equipped with native machine learning models, intelligent autofill, or algorithmic classification features.

Standard Digital Tool

ABC programming language

Development environment software

Standard professional software requiring manual operator navigation and human execution.

Standard Digital Tool

Blackboard software

Data base user interface and query software

Standard professional software requiring manual operator navigation and human execution.

Active Copilot Available

Web browser software

Internet browser software

Direct generative copilot integration actively assists with drafting, synthesis, or automated workflow execution.

Source: O*NET 30.3 Software Skills & Labor Market Tech Tracking

Monitored technology competencies, employer demand tags, and enterprise AI integrations.

Defensibility Analysis · Physical & Social Moat

Automation Defense & Moat Breakdown

O*NET physical, social, and contextual insulation protecting Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education from software-only displacement.

61 / 100
Moderate Hybrid Moat

Physical Proximity & On-Site Presence

80/100

Requires tangible physical presence, spatial navigation, or on-site operation.

Insulation Level Strong Defense

Interpersonal & Face-to-Face Interaction

93/100

Requires direct human engagement, empathy, negotiation, or high-stakes care.

Insulation Level Strong Defense

Manual Dexterity & Psychomotor Agility

9/100

Requires fine-motor coordination, tool handling, tactile feedback, or dynamic physical control.

Insulation Level High Digital Exposure

Decision Autonomy & Cognitive Nuance

71/100

Requires unstructured decision-making, contextual judgment, and real-time adaptability.

Insulation Level Strong Defense

Labor Insulation Insight: Why Physical & Social Barriers Matter

Moderate Hybrid Moat: Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education combines digital administrative duties with human-centric physical or interpersonal responsibilities. While digital tasks face rapid copilot compression, direct face-to-face interaction and real-world judgment continue to require human authority.

Strongest Defense Pillar: Interpersonal & Face-to-Face Interaction (93/100)
Most Exposed Vector: Manual Dexterity & Psychomotor Agility (9/100)

Source: O*NET 30.3 Work Context & Abilities Framework

Evaluates Physical Proximity (4.C.2.a.3), Face-to-Face (4.C.1.a.2.l), and Agility metrics.

Labor Economics · Wage Ladder

Salary Spectrum & Earning Tiers

Federal OEWS compensation distribution for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education.

Career Upside: +$58k (+121%)
Mean Wage: $73,800
10th Pct Entry

$48,040

Starting & baseline wage tier

25th Pct Early

$54,290

Established junior practitioner

50th Pct Median

$65,220

National benchmark benchmark

75th Pct Senior

$83,340

Experienced tier compensation

90th Pct Ceiling

$106,380

Top 10% highest earners

Middle 50% Spread: The middle half of Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education professionals earn between $54,290 and $83,340 (a $29,050 range).

OEWS National Survey Data

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS)

Annual wage estimates across all industries and ownership types.

Transition recommendation

Secondary school educators should transition from administrative lesson planning and manual grading toward high-touch mentorship, complex socio-emotional support, and experiential classroom facilitation. Developing proficiency in AI-assisted curriculum differentiation enables teachers to save time on administrative tasks and focus on deeper pedagogical engagement.

One lower-risk path that shares overlapping O*NET work activities is Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education (AI risk 30, activity overlap 87%, median pay $63,970).

How we score Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education

We pull Core O*NET task statements for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education, score each for Generative AI automation probability, weight by O*NET importance, and merge the result with BLS wages and employment projections on the SOC code. Full methodology, limitations, and prompt versioning are documented on the methodology page.

Full methodology & limitations · Open task breakdown

FAQ: Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education and Generative AI

Why does Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education score 42 / 100?

Overall automation risk is moderate because, while instructional prep and grading are highly automated, in-person behavioral management and relationship-building remain resilient. Curriculum drafting and assessment evaluation most strongly drive automation exposure, whereas direct classroom discipline and student counseling safeguard the role. This quarter, educators should integrate GenAI tools into routine lesson planning and grading to reduce administrative overhead and reclaim instructional time for direct student interaction.

Will AI replace Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education?

Partially. Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education scores 42/100 — some core duties are highly automatable, but enough durable human work remains that the occupation is transforming rather than disappearing overnight. This is a task-exposure index, not a guarantee that hiring stops.

What is the AI automation risk score for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education?

The score is an importance-weighted average of automation probabilities across the top 15 O*NET tasks for SOC 25-2031.00. 1 task score at or above 80% automatable; 7 fall into the safer band (under 30% or labeled physical). Roughly 45% of scored tasks are primarily digital.

Which Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education tasks are most exposed to Generative AI?

None of the top 15 tasks currently clear the ≥80% automation threshold — exposure is more diffuse across mid-range probabilities.

Which Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education tasks are safest from AI?

Few tasks in this profile clear the “safe” threshold, which is why the aggregate score skews higher and why adjacent lower-risk careers deserve serious consideration.

What does BLS project for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education employment and pay?

Official BLS data places median pay for this occupation family at $72,040. with projected employment change of -0.2% over the latest 10-year outlook window. Typical entry education: Bachelor's degree. Wage and growth context ($72,040, -0.2%) should be read alongside the AI score — not as a substitute for it.

What should Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education workers do next?

Secondary school educators should transition from administrative lesson planning and manual grading toward high-touch mentorship, complex socio-emotional support, and experiential classroom facilitation. Developing proficiency in AI-assisted curriculum differentiation enables teachers to save time on administrative tasks and focus on deeper pedagogical engagement.

How is this score calculated?

We pull Core O*NET task statements for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education, score each for Generative AI automation probability, weight by O*NET importance, and merge the result with BLS wages and employment projections on the SOC code. Full methodology, limitations, and prompt versioning are documented on the methodology page.

How do physical presence and interpersonal skills protect Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education?

Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education demonstrates a hybrid defense profile (61/100, verdict: "Moderate Hybrid Moat"). While its digital and documentation workflows are exposed to generative AI compression, direct human-in-the-loop engagement (93/100) and contextual real-world adaptability provide a durable defensive moat against complete end-to-end automation. Interpersonal & Face-to-Face Interaction is the primary barrier (93/100), protecting human workers from algorithmic displacement.

What is the wage potential and salary ceiling for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education?

Federal OEWS data reveals an earning spread of $58,340 from the 10th percentile ($48,040) to the 90th percentile ($106,380). The middle 50% of practitioners earn between $54,290 and $83,340. Compensation for Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education reflects a hybrid balance of cognitive judgment and physical/interpersonal execution. Top-tier compensation ($106,380) is driven by complex problem-solving and domain mastery that resists routine software automation.

Do OpenAI and academic benchmarks agree on Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education automation risk?

Evaluations show divergence between algorithmic models and human panels. AI Career Stats rates task vulnerability at 42/100, whereas OpenAI's direct GPT-4 model estimated 3/100 and human annotators estimated 34/100. Divergence typically arises when human experts recognize nuanced organizational and interpersonal hurdles that pure task-parsing models discount. Software tooling expansion increases exposure by +30 points (from 3/100 to 33/100), demonstrating that integrating AI into existing software suites significantly expands automated task throughput.

Lower-risk alternatives

One lower-risk path that shares overlapping O*NET work activities is Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education (AI risk 30, activity overlap 87%, median pay $63,970).

Full matrix

Related pages