Skip to content

Federal data × LLM scoring

AI Career Stats

Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health: daily tasks & AI impact

This page breaks Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health into the top 15 daily O*NET tasks and scores each for Generative AI automation probability. Those task scores roll up to an overall vulnerability index of 46/100 (Moderate automation risk). Struck-through rows are ≥80% automatable; highlighted safer rows are under 30% or primarily physical.

0 highly automatable 0 safer / physical Back to risk score Alternative careers

High-automation exposure

No task in this set currently exceeds the 80% threshold, so risk is spread across moderate probabilities rather than a few catastrophic duties.

Durable human work

This profile has little “safe” task mass under our thresholds. Workers should treat AI fluency as mandatory and actively map transferable skills into lower-risk roles.

Importance comes from O*NET incumbent ratings. Automation probability is model-generated for current Generative AI capability (not speculative AGI). Digital / physical / mixed labels describe the modality of the work, which strongly correlates with near-term automation potential.

Task Importance AI probability Nature
Communicate scientific or technical information to the public, organizations, or internal audiences through oral briefings, written documents, workshops, conferences, training sessions, or public hearings. Core 4.06
Monitor effects of pollution or land degradation and recommend means of prevention or control. Core 3.97
Collect, synthesize, analyze, manage, and report environmental data, such as pollution emission measurements, atmospheric monitoring measurements, meteorological or mineralogical information, or soil or water samples. Core 3.8
Review and implement environmental technical standards, guidelines, policies, and formal regulations that meet all appropriate requirements. Core 3.79
Provide scientific or technical guidance, support, coordination, or oversight to governmental agencies, environmental programs, industry, or the public. Core 3.72
Evaluate violations or problems discovered during inspections to determine appropriate regulatory actions or to provide advice on the development and prosecution of regulatory cases. Supplemental 3.66
Process and review environmental permits, licenses, or related materials. Core 3.64
Conduct environmental audits or inspections or investigations of violations. Core 3.64
Analyze data to determine validity, quality, and scientific significance and to interpret correlations between human activities and environmental effects. Supplemental 3.53
Provide advice on proper standards and regulations or the development of policies, strategies, or codes of practice for environmental management. Core 3.51
Investigate and report on accidents affecting the environment. Supplemental 3.5
Prepare charts or graphs from data samples, providing summary information on the environmental relevance of the data. Core 3.43
Research sources of pollution to determine their effects on the environment and to develop theories or methods of pollution abatement or control. Core 3.43
Supervise or train students, environmental technologists, technicians, or other related staff. Core 3.39
Monitor environmental impacts of development activities. Core 3.22

What remains human

No tasks currently fall under the safe threshold for this occupation.

FAQ

Which Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health tasks are most exposed to AI?

No task in this set currently exceeds the 80% threshold, so risk is spread across moderate probabilities rather than a few catastrophic duties.

Which Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health tasks are safest from Generative AI?

This profile has little “safe” task mass under our thresholds. Workers should treat AI fluency as mandatory and actively map transferable skills into lower-risk roles.

How should I read the Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health task table?

Importance comes from O*NET incumbent ratings. Automation probability is model-generated for current Generative AI capability (not speculative AGI). Digital / physical / mixed labels describe the modality of the work, which strongly correlates with near-term automation potential.

Related